| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
That's right, answer just one issue in the *hope* you score a cheap point.
> > ==+==
> > I reject that even if the sanctions actually *caused* the death of even 1
> > child that it's the fault of the imposers of the sanctions for the deaths.
> > The *fault* lies with the lawless dictator Hussein, not the US.
> > ==+==
> >
> > Do you still stand by that?
>
> Yes.
Can you support this, or is it mere opinion. Do you think the UNICEF data
and opinion I quoted was wrong?
Do you still stand by this:
==+==
I reject that the sanctions are the REASON that children (however many)
died. The sanctions do not prevent the flow of food into the country.
==+==
Do you think sanctaions have not caused their to be less food in Iraq?
> This leg has nothing to do with whether the stat is right or whether
> the causality link is there.
In your opionion. But I think it shows how little you understand the
issue... in my opinion.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: War
|
| (...) Yes. This leg has nothing to do with whether the stat is right or whether the causality link is there. (25 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
