To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13577
13576  |  13578
Subject: 
Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:29:31 GMT
Viewed: 
310 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:

If
America really values freedom and human rights, why do we support
Israel--world leader in human rights violations, oppressor of people in the
name of their religion, every bit a dirty dog as the Taliban?

I think this may be a bit of a stretch, Dan, and saying it isn't going to
convince many people of the justness of your cause.

By the way, I think I may have missed your answer to my question about the
original UN resolution creating Israel. (I got Scott's answer but not yours
or anyone elses) Do you support that resolution or do you think that *no*
Israel, no matter *how* constituted, has a right to exist?

Indeed. I think the best course of action to ensure lasting peace is to not
to jump in bed with filthy dogs since all we get is more fleas.

I think we can all agree with that one.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
 
(...) <snipped> It's all one big, ugly mess. However, it comes as no surprise to me that some Palestinians, after years of American supported Israeli occupation and brutality, would praise Bin Laden. It would be different if America WAS actually (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR