Debate : 1326


Off-Topic / Debate / 1326	1325 \| 1327

Subject:	Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:33:08 GMT
Reply-To:	c576653@cclabs.missouri.eduANTISPAM
Viewed:	1179 times

Ed Jones wrote: > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: > > > I think that in a perfect liberatopia, all three of these people would > > have no problem getting the care they need, through charity. > > So you are saying that these people have the right to the care that they need. > Isn't charity the giving of free goods? Are you saying that these people have > a right to free goods? He didn't say a right; he said they would _probably_ receive charity. -- Sincerely, Christopher L. Weeks central Missouri, USA

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) It should also be said that charity doesn't automatically mean "free" goods. Habitat for Humanity is very definitely a charity, but they don't give away houses. They ask their benneficiaries to help build the house and in general to show (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) So you are saying that these people have the right to the care that they need. Isn't charity the giving of free goods? Are you saying that these people have a right to free goods? (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search