 | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) You don't specifically state this, but it seems the suggestion is that Koresh was a terrorist. You do know that that's incorrect, don't you? And further, that he (and his) was(were) victimized by the US people -- rather than the other way (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) C'mon, you have it all wrong!!! We don't go around doing bad things. We are the "good guys." And anyway, the U.S. Government co-signed it so that makes it okay... ...its "US" (U.S.?) or "THEM", right? -- Hop-Frog (who sips his Ruby Ridge over (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) No, we just put a spin on it to make it look like we do. (...) Yep, apparently that's what it now is. (...) -Dave (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Response to Misinformation (Some other perspectives on the tragedy) —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) No, I make the suggestion that Koresh and his followers were fanatics. You don't have to be a terrorist to be fanatical. I'm pointing out that misguided religious folk make excellent fanatics. Give people what they want, and they will follow (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
