To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12444
12443  |  12445
Subject: 
Re: Bummer of the Week: LEGO Made in China
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:32:35 GMT
Viewed: 
2847 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mladen Pejic writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > > >  I have to confess that my WWII knowledge is somewhat less than • exhaustive.
> > > > However, while I don't deny the importance of the US role, it's tricky to
> > > > say (although Greg has now clarified that he was being sarcastic) that the
> > > > US "saved" Europe, which implies to me that the US was somehow
> > > > singlehandedly responsible for fending off the German army.
> > > >  What I really want to know is where the heck was Russia during all this
> > > > Nazi stuff?  ;^)
> > 
> > I'm very suprised (almost shocked!) that you say this? Don't you know how • many
> > millions of Russians died during WWII??? [1] 25,568,000!!! These are the
> > highest casualties in the entire war.
> 
>   Thereabouts.  The true tally can never be known, at least not
>   in *this* life--even your source admits that his three sources
>   (probably Volkogonov, Conquest, and Messenger) vary widely.  The
>   reputable sources hover between 20 and 27 million.  In any case,
>   that's a WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE.

Yeah, it's quite shocking.

> 
> > Other things:
> > 
> > The Battle of Stalingrad (and also one of the worst battles in the war) was a
> > *HUGE* turning point in the war.
> 
>   Don't forget about the siege of Leningrad, which is often forgotten--
>   if I'm not mistaken, it was one of the two or three longest sieges in
>   recorded history.  They were completely cut off for three years, and
>   refused to surrender--and they were reduced to some pretty low living.
>   Wow.  And this was in a Baltic Sea that the Germans dominated the
>   entire time!

Yeah, the Russians don't give up very easily. Thank God (and I'm not religious
;-D) they didn't, things could have went differently...

> 
> > The Soviet army reached Hitler's bunker first.
> 
>   Yes, but Berlin's to the East.  :D

Hehe... yeah. ;-)

> 
> > The Battle of Kursk was one of the greatest tank battles in history (Soviets
> > won).
> 
>   It was, in fact, the largest armored confrontation of all time.
>   Some 4,000 vehicles, if memory serves--the Soviets used the T-34's
>   mobility *very* effectively.

Two million soldiers as well!

> 
> > The Soviet army destroyed (i.e. completely) practically all the German armies
> > that had invaded the U.S.S.R.
> 
>   They either destroyed them or, like an amoeba, gobbled them up--
>   and German land doctrine was the *precise antithesis* of their
>   sea doctrine--no retreat, no surrender, not one step to the north,
>   not one step to the south.  Sort of like a Moscow-Going Zax.

Yeah, even that bit scares me. I can only imagine how difficult it must have
been for the Soviets the press on forward and never be able to retreat. Quite
horrible, but it did win the war.

> 
> > Sorry, this post does sound very one sided, but not enough is said about the
> > U.S.S.R. and it's role in WWII. However, most Americans love
> > violent pro-American WWII movies which glorify the war, and the U.S.S.R. and
> > its allies were the "Evil Commies" (yes, that was sarcasm), so this should • not
> > be very suprising. ;-)
> 
>   The really interesting thing about this comment is that the
>   USSR produced these sorts of movies too!  We don't think of them
>   because Russian just isn't a world language like it seemed it could
>   become once--there are many WWII movies that show the businesslike,
>   steely Soviets, who nevertheless are real and wholesome men and
>   workers, while the American soldiers care only about carousing,
>   about the spoils of war, and they're pampered and decadent.  The
>   message isn't articulated exactly the converse from ours, which
>   makes it even more interesting--for them, the ideology is the crux.

Well, I didn't know that (actually, I sorta expected they did; propaganda works
miracles ;-D).

> 
>   Anyways, if you get a chance to see a real Russian movie from
>   during the Cold War about WWII (with subtitles, for most of you)
>   take it--you'll never watch a war movie the same way again.  I
>   sure can't!

Will do! ;-)

> 
>   best
> 
>   LFB

Thanks for the comments Lindsay! I wish you were my history teacher! ;-)

Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://www3.sympatico.ca/mladenpejic/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bummer of the Week: LEGO Made in China
 
(...) Thereabouts. The true tally can never be known, at least not in *this* life--even your source admits that his three sources (probably Volkogonov, Conquest, and Messenger) vary widely. The reputable sources hover between 20 and 27 million. In (...) (25 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR