Subject:
|
Highway Funds & Drinking
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:01:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
179 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Victor Knight writes:
> Because US Congress, overstepping their bounds as usual, attatched a
> conditional to highway funds so that if a state had a lower drinking age
> than 21, they would not get the highway funds. (Of course the money comes
> from the citizens of the states in the first place..)
Heh-- not always :) If you recall recently there was a big hubbub about
Mass's jynormous highway project, the Big Dig, and whether or not to cut of
federal funds since the project was ridiculously over budget and overdue. I
think it's the largest budgeted road construction project in US history...
Oh, and as a debate starter, just as an example of one of the things they
spent money on... They spent over 1 million dollars on a "fish-startling
system" so that fish wouldn't be killed by their activities.
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Highway Funds & Drinking
|
| (...) Geez, and we just lost $10 million in Federal pork for our Manhattan Bridge which is only a $2 billion refurbushing. I bet it went to Boston (oink oink). -Erik -surviving Week 1 of the Manhattan Bridge "biggest subway reroute ever seen in New (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
| (...) Because US Congress, overstepping their bounds as usual, attatched a conditional to highway funds so that if a state had a lower drinking age than 21, they would not get the highway funds. (Of course the money comes from the citizens of the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
