Subject:
|
Re: US age restrictions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:02:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
210 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> > 18 -
> - Usually the age one can _act_ in a pornographic film - see
> below...
> > 21 -
> - Usually the age one can _buy_ or be _given_ pornography (i.e. those 18 year olds can't even be shown a screening of the film they acted in...)
In what states is that the case? As far as I know, in PA, NY, and TX the
buying age in 18.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: US age restrictions
|
| (...) year olds can't even be shown a screening of the film they acted in...) (...) Everywhere that I've lived since I was a teen, this was true. Missouri and Illinois for sure, and I think New Jersey too. Chris (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: US age restrictions
|
| (...) - usually treated as an adult within the court system (...) Actually, this one varies for various things. (...) - Usually the age one can _act_ in a pornographic film - see below... (...) - Usually the age one can _buy_ or be _given_ (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
