To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12029
12028  |  12030
Subject: 
Re: National vote on handguns?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:44:43 GMT
Viewed: 
714 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

Oh dang - it was a fireman responding to a call and now you are up for
manslaughter!  Sorry, you don't get to shoot people just because they are in
your home.

Not sure where you're coming from, but where I'm at it's legal to shoot
first and ask questions later when an unidentified person is in your home.

Generally, no, you are wrong.  You have to establish reasonable belief that
your life was in danger.  Example, I'm standing there admiring your Lego
with you, when you spot a 10 year old ripping off one of your sets (Black
Seas Schooner, dang, a good reason to shoot!) and start blasting away.  You
didn't have probable cause to shoot.  And in the case of the fireman, you
wouldn't have much of a leg to stand on regardless of no witnesses.


OK, you are right with regard to the fireman situation. I should have
qualified the unidentified person better. In general, if a stranger is in my
home uninvited I'll be going after them with everything that I have until
they are either subdued, incapacitated or dead (or I am one of the latter
two). I'm automatically assuming that I am in danger because the sactity and
safety of my home has already been violated, so who's to say the intruder
cares about my personal safety? And that stands regardless of age.

You answer is a good example of why I think people who want firearms should
be required to take a course and pass a test (not just about the safe
handling of weapons, but also the legal ramifications of using them).


To put your mind at ease, I do not own a firearm in the technical sense. The
closest thing I have is a paintball gun. (By the time I located all of the
necessary parts to fire it, plus some good paintballs I'm sure the whole
event would be over.) But you can be sure that I won't be an easy target.
I've already made that mistake once and it cost me some very nice power tools...

All bets are off in Texas, of course, where you used to get to shoot your
wife if you caught her in comprimising circumstances.

Granted, there have been a couple of unfortunate "mistakes" where a family
member has been taken out by another person living in the residence. Or the
cops having the wrong address on their search warrant. In general, I'm glad
to have that law in place. I would like to have the opportunity waste the
scumbag who has the balls to sneak into my residence and take property (or
worse) which I spent my hard-earned money on. The only thing you have to be
sure of is finishing the job, otherwise you could find yourself in a big
lawsuit and paying money to the bonehead who was robbing you in the first >>place.

Ahhhh, the Death Penalty for stealing a crust of bread.  Judge Dredd in
action, "I yam the law!"
:-)


What's mine is mine. The only people entitled to what I have are the people
who I am legally obligated to share with, or who I deem worthy.


Bruce

-Duane



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) That argument won't stand up in court. Well, maybe it will in Texas... (...) Ahhh, the Death Penalty for power tools! Forgive me if I was not paying attention: is that more defensible than the Death Penalty for a crust of bread? (...) Hey, no (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) Generally, no, you are wrong. You have to establish reasonable belief that your life was in danger. Example, I'm standing there admiring your Lego with you, when you spot a 10 year old ripping off one of your sets (Black Seas Schooner, dang, a (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR