To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11954
11953  |  11955
Subject: 
Re: National vote on handguns?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 10:16:59 GMT
Viewed: 
911 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:

> why not put it to a national vote? This IS the land of one man, one
> vote after all (or one woman, one vote as well).

That is not how (well, actually, I suppose we _could_ make it happen that way)
our constitution is changed.

> The right to bear arms, as described in our Constitution, was created at a
> point in history when the only personal firearm was a muzzle loader (musket
> or rather large pistol). Therefore, since times and technology have changed,
> I say the right should remain but be narrowed to exclude handguns and
> automatic weapons for the simple reason (and fact) of their common use in
> thousands upon thousands of crimes, injuries and killings annually in our
> country.

I'd rather we just do away with all weaponry.  Might as well.

> If it's such an important right and individual freedom in our country, all
> registered American voters deserve the chance to decide their fate as
> individuals and as a society. This is about people living and dying, often
> needlessly, clinging to a believe that deserves serious reconsideration for
> everyone's well being.

Everyone in my neighborhood is armed.  There hasn't been a killing in my
neighborhood in many many years (perhaps not since the Lindbergh baby).  Guns
aren't about killing and dying.  They are about preparation, defense, and a way
of life.  People die needlessly because of their societal expectations and
their actions.  I've had people argue with me on this point, but I still assert
that anyone can move.  People should move away from dangerous places.

> I say put it to a national vote and let the people
> decide, not the politicians and especially not the lobbyists. Let democracy
> prevail on this matter, as it once did over 200 years ago.

I don't think that's exactly how it worked.

Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  National vote on handguns?
 
It's too complicated to follow all the posts about handguns and automatic weapons, so I'll throw the following idea into the wind. Since America IS a democracy and every individual has an opinion on handguns and automatic weapons, why not put it to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR