 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Stephen Rusnak
|
| | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GGqtL6.25y@lugnet.com... (...) owner needs (...) nothing ever is. (...) powerful (...) aposteriori (...) nonetheless, (...) white could (...) could (...) except (...) somewhere (and (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Why? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) You can negotiate tight situations, like twisty narrow hallways better with such a weapon. Why not? Chris (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Stephen Rusnak
|
| | | | <snip> (...) is (...) and (...) the (...) must (...) to (...) stock (...) Greater concealability, better maneuverability. Nothing says "You broke into the wrong house" like .00 buckshot to the chest. -- Overkill is the only sure kill. SR (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
