Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:41:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
449 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> By the way I'd support a significant change to the 2nd. It needs to be
> reworded to be clearer.
Would you support a rewording that was in opposition to your
interpretation of the amendment and to your interpretation of the original
authors' intent?
(Assuming, of course, that any rewording was accomplished through legal and
proper procedures.)
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) I support clarifying the meaning. Maybe the best way is to compose several alternative replacements that have different meanings (but all of which are clear in *what* they mean) and see which one survives the process. I'd actively work to (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) No, it does not imply either of those things. I'm shocked, just shocked, that you would not be able to read my words and derive the clear meaning they contain. But oh well. The constitution suffers from lack of clarity in many places, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
