Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 04:17:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
463 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > By the way I'd support a significant change to the 2nd. It needs to be
> > reworded to be clearer.
>
> Would you support a rewording that was in opposition to your
> interpretation of the amendment and to your interpretation of the original
> authors' intent?
I support clarifying the meaning. Maybe the best way is to compose several
alternative replacements that have different meanings (but all of which are
clear in *what* they mean) and see which one survives the process. I'd
actively work to support some, and actively work to oppose some.
My fundamental point here, which I haven't seen any discussion on, is that
I'd rather see clarity and strict interpretation, and working for change
openly, than what we have now, which is flawed, because it's not an open
process.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) But the fundamental question is, if something contrary to your personal view is chosen at the end of the legal process by a majority decision, would you abide by it? If it meant giving up your unconditional requirement to arm yourself, would (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Would you support a rewording that was in opposition to your interpretation of the amendment and to your interpretation of the original authors' intent? (Assuming, of course, that any rewording was accomplished through legal and proper (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
