Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:46:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Nope. You are trivialising the issue rather than addressing the point. "The
> > forefathers" could not comprehend what weapons would do in a few hundred
> > years time (ie today). What do you think handguns will be like a few hundred
> > years from now?
>
> They could comprehend that the same ordnance _must_ be available to both the
> military and the civilians.
Even tanks? Even fighter jets? Even chemical weapons? Even ICBM's?
Scott A
>
> Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| So what IS your point then? My point is that there are more dangerous things than guns. If I am not mistaken, one of the statistics sited here directly showed that most gun deaths are actually suicides...and that the percentage of child deaths is (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
