Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:42:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
377 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason J. Railton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > >
> > > > Wrong. I'm protecting the constitution from you. And I'll win or die.
> > >
> > > Spot on. Those that sacrifice freedom for peace shall have neither.
> >
> > Strange, but my idea of freedom is not living in constant fear of being
> > shot. That's why each of you wants a gun - to defend yourself against all
> > the others who have guns. It doesn't even occur to you that everyone else
> > wants a gun because they don't trust you with one either. It's a culture of
> > incredibly selfish paranoia. There's anything noble about it.
> >
> > The constitution was written in a completely different time, when arms were
> > muzzle-loading muskets and rifles - about as effective as throwing a knife,
> > but much longer to prepare a shot. These were highly conspicuous when
> > carried in the street, and rarely kept loaded because of the risk of
> > personal injury (that and the risk of looking foolish when the powder and
> > shot fall out). There's nothing noble in taking regulations for a standy
> > militia and twisting the meaning to justify these escalations in civilian
> > armament.
> >
> > Jason J Railton
>
> Whew!!
>
> now it all makes sense. The forefathers considered how long it took to load
> a muzzle and the likelyhood of the ammo spilling out when they proposed the
> right to bear arms...
Nope. You are trivialising the issue rather than addressing the point. "The
forefathers" could not comprehend what weapons would do in a few hundred
years time (ie today). What do you think handguns will be like a few hundred
years from now?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Whew!! now it all makes sense. The forefathers considered how long it took to load a muzzle and the likelyhood of the ammo spilling out when they proposed the right to bear arms... (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
