 | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | (...) follow-on article at the bottom too, but that is terrible. I mean, the guy is a convicted child molestor, on probation. So, maybe reconsider his probation or schedule some more therapy[1][2] - something appropriate. But to convict him in that (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Could you elaborate on this a bit? Thanks. (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) Erm - so that someone can nit-pick and flame me? I did write a load of stuff in reply to this, then deleted the lot. It just occured to me that I'd then have to spend the next year trying to explain 'irony'. What's the betting I have to anyway (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) This even happens on Lugnet: (URL) (...) It is about to become law in New York State. There are plans to do the same in the UK: (URL) (...) Indeed. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Originally to produce a state where the citizenry would have it in their power if they ever deemed it necessary to overthrow the governance by force. Now to maintain (and try to get back to) a state where the citizenry would have it in their (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, I get it. So, what you're saying, is that the whole democratic process is just for show. You place your vote, you elect your leaders, but at any time you can up arms as a mob and take them out again. Okay, sorry, that's unfair. Every (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Democratic election is not just for show. It is a first attempt at getting things right. And we have 200 years of showing that it works out pretty well. (There have been some roadbumps along the way, but that's true for everyone.) Not (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I'd hate to put words in Jason's mouth. But when I read his text I immediately thought about how your constitution has allowed persecution and discrimination on the grounds of political views and race in the last 50 years. I can think of no (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
