To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11662
11661  |  11663
Subject: 
Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:43:09 GMT
Viewed: 
1268 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Lane writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
That's just beyond belief.  I can't adequately express the outrage I'm feeling over
the stupidity of the judge that actually let this happen (make no mistake, the
judge is the only one to blame for this, he has the ultimate power in the case).

I think the judge should be disbarred.

10 years! he should have got twenty, he was already on probation, He
probably would have done it evetually and locking him up hardly counts as a
loss to society! I think what society gains from the removal of the risk he
posed far outways any supposed infringement of his rights.

Steve Lane
So, you're saying that the government can arrest me for fictional writings
about something that is illegal, but never took place anywhere but in my
head? And that it's right?!

-Duane



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
 
(...) Let me add to that. Fictional writings that were never published or distributed and intended for my own private use (enjoyment?). (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
 
(...) Yes Look if someone has convictions for bomb making and you find a fake plan of a bombing campaign in his home, your gonna put 2 and 2 together and put him away. How do you know it was 'fake' he's gonna say that isnt he. Same in this case (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Laws about sex.... (was something else)
 
(...) 10 years! he should have got twenty, he was already on probation, He probably would have done it evetually and locking him up hardly counts as a loss to society! I think what society gains from the removal of the risk he posed far outways any (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR