Debate : 11553


Off-Topic / Debate / 11553	11552 \| 11554

Subject:	Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:26:53 GMT
Viewed:	739 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: > > > Scott A wrote: > > There are real issue out their • (sic) > > which are worth talking about Loss of first amendment rights (while the populace cheers on the loss) in the US *is* a real issue, whether you like it or not. In fact, whether you *understand* it or not, actually, since you have demonstrated with your slurring and sniping and rails against child pornography that you don't understand what the first amendment actually means or why it is important. > > It > > often surprises me how big news stories in the US/world(1) never make it to > > this group, instead we talk about how much morals a stone can have. "how many morals" or "how much morality" would be the correct usage, I think. This would be because *you* dragged the conversation there, I think. In my view it was you that narrowed the focus down to sparring over what amoral means because you'd rather do that than admit you were caught in a contradiction. How like you to then complain about it, Scott. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1402000/1402880.stm > > Wow!.. Is this really a big news story? I didn't expected that. I'd characterise it as significant! It's bad news for democracy to ban political parties (or make the playing field uneven, as it is in the US), even ones that are advocating non democratic courses. (that is why banning the Communist party was wrong back when the US did it) Was it something you were aware of already, Selçuk? That is, did it make the Turkish press? And how does the Turkish press reporting contrast with the BBCs? My view of the Turkish press (based on nothing at all other than gut feeling and some superficial reading) is that it's not particularly free. (tieing back to the First Amendment and freedom of press) ++Lar

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
(...) I do not think I have metioned child in this thread... but you are correct, I do not understand it. Do you support child pornography? What about child prositution? (...) Is this the best you can do? (...) Ah. It is my fault. I see. I should (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
(...) <snip> (...) I really don't agree. In a country like mine, you can't go fully democratic since there is no common sense majority that prevent the population from total collapse into some stupid "islamic republic" thing, just like in Iran. In a (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
(...) Selçuk (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search