 | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | (...) Not quite true. Think about it a bit, it will come to you - there are at least 2 other ways... (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Kevin Bannister
|
| | | | | (...) Sterility and vasectomy/hysterectomy? (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | I would put vasectomoy/hysterectomy within the sterility umbrella (even though sterility is often not CHOSEN, and V/H can be). There are other ways... (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Sterilization and sticking to the same gender (girls typically don't get girls pregnant, nor do boys typically get boys pregnant). (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) One would expect not anyway: (URL) A (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | (...) Very interesting. I will have to read more about it and see how the story developes. I hadn't heard of the technique before, so I can't argue any points about it yet :-) -Duane (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Dave spotted it too: (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | (...) Court order? (URL) Yes contraceptives are effective, just not 100% effective. If you (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) heh. Vasectomy and castration (chemical or otherwise) are generally quite effective, as is tubal ligation or hysterectomy. In addition, homosexual intercourse traditionally has a low occurrence of pregnancy. Dave! (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Around we go again... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) 'Dissenting Judge Ann Bradley said the sentence violated the "basic human right" to have children.' Wasn't aware of such a right. Who's got her email address, maybe she could present her reasons for that viewpoint here and settle (1) a (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Around we go again... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I am, if we share an understanding of what "basic" means. Even if we do not, there is this : Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 16. (I expect Duane will contest both. ;/) However, the paranoid in me tells me that this is the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Around we go again... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | (...) For the benifit of other readers: (URL) 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Around we go again... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) When one read this again it looks rather quaint: "have the right to marry and to found a family". Although I am sure/hope it is not intended today, but it implies that marriage should come before having children. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Around we go again... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | (...) I had typed out a whole paragraph arguing exactly that point, but thought it was vague enough that I let it be. Besides, I didn't want to prove your statement about me above to be true. :-) (...) -Duane (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Around we go again... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Well? Is there a contrary view? Scott A (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
