To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11621
11620  |  11622
Subject: 
Re: Around we go again...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:28:03 GMT
Viewed: 
2554 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > Court order?
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://news.excite.com/news/r/010711/08/odd-children-dc
> > > > 
> > > > From the article:
> > > > 
> > > > 'Dissenting Judge Ann Bradley said the sentence violated the "basic human
> > > > right" to have children.'
> > > > 
> > > > Wasn't aware of such a right.
> > > 
> > > I am, if we share an understanding of what "basic" means. Even if we do not,
> > > there is this : Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 16. (I
> > > expect Duane will contest both. ;/)
> > 
> > 
> > For the benifit of other readers:
> > http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
> > 
> > Article 16.
> > (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race,
> > nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They
> > are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its
> > dissolution.
> 
> When one read this again it looks rather quaint: "have the right to marry
> and to found a family". Although I am sure/hope it is not intended today,
> but it implies that marriage should come before having children.


I had typed out a whole paragraph arguing exactly that point, but thought it
was vague enough that I let it be. Besides, I didn't want to prove your
statement about me above to be true. :-)

> Scott A

-Duane
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Around we go again...
 
(...) When one read this again it looks rather quaint: "have the right to marry and to found a family". Although I am sure/hope it is not intended today, but it implies that marriage should come before having children. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR