Debate : 11459


Off-Topic / Debate / 11459	11458 \| 11460

Subject:	Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:58:25 GMT
Viewed:	1632 times

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: > Finding cites other than PETA is probably worthwile. I'm not too > inclined to pay much heed to their opinions. Why? Just curious. Dan

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) They are one of the most extreme "animal rights" organizations. While I do feel there probably are some bad practices with animals, I don't think blowing up buildings, burning buildings, and other such destructive (and possibly endangering (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) I think some crop growing methods may be suspect also. Certainly there are situations of overuse of pesticides, and monoculture growing is probably not ideal either, but there's certainly less to potentially get up in arms about. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search