Subject:
|
Re: Making money on the Net (Was: New Web Page)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 21:16:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1043 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 08:49:06 GMT, Terry K uttered the following profundities...
> On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 16:43:28 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
>
> > Terry K wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:12:52 GMT, richard.dee@virgin.net (Richard Dee) wrote:
> > > Oh, you want to scan them and compare online? AFAIK, in the US, it is not
> > > illegal to make copies of currency as long as the copy is a certain minimum
> > > percentage larger or smaller. Not sure of the percentage. 25% +- does spring
> > > to mind, though.
> >
> > It's my understanding, also, that some percentage of the scan or copy needs
> > to be obscured or obliterated.
> >
> > But that probably wouldn't get in the way of getting two scans, with
> > different parts missing, and pasting them together digitally...
>
> I must be sick, I just took the time to search this out:
> http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/money_illustrations.htm
>
> Pretty interesting. The most interesting point is the how to define "after
> their final use" in section #3.
I'll read it later. I do know a phenomenal amount of US dollar
notes pass through London, via some US city, each week.
Replacement of old bills going to the US, and new, from.
> And, come to think of it, how does one specify a size on a computer monitor?
> For instance, the image on the page:
> http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/money_damaged.htm seems to be almost exactly
> life-sized on my monitor.
>
> -- Terry K --
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site: http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071 AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit: http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model? http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Making money on the Net (Was: New Web Page)
|
| (...) It's my understanding, also, that some percentage of the scan or copy needs to be obscured or obliterated. But that probably wouldn't get in the way of getting two scans, with different parts missing, and pasting them together digitally... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
