 | | The purpose of lugnet.off-topic.debate (was Re: What is spam?) —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | (...) Man, you're just lookin' for a debate (any debate!) today, aren't ya'? 8?D I know I'll likley break my own word at some time in the future, and probably get lambasted then for doing so, but here goes: <way too rightous for my own good> I read (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The purpose of lugnet.off-topic.debate (was Re: What is spam?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) That wasn't Todd's intent, read the intro post he made that shows the charter. You are more than welcome not to participate. It would be too bad if you didn't, unlike some current participants we'd be better off without, but there is no one (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The purpose of lugnet.off-topic.debate (was Re: What is spam?) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Gerber writes: <snip> (...) You've got a point, but it's not directed at the right group. *All* the off-topic groups are meant to discuss *non*-lego things, which is why (well... sorta (1)) they are on the default (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The purpose of lugnet.off-topic.debate (was Re: What is spam?) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Blasphemy!!! And I was just getting to like you!! (...) Hmmmph. You dunno what yer missin! ROSCO (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
