Subject:
|
Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:48:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1463 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> Aha... now we've reached a potential crux. What do and do not have rights?
> Does a dog? How about a baby? Does a retarded human? Cro-magnon man?
This, once again, is the false dichotomy at work. Are you not asking that
a line be drawn as a crossroads between sentient and non-sentient (ie:
crux)? It was my impression that you'd already agreed no such line could be
drawn, even though a distinction clearly exists (albeit admittedly bounded
by gray areas).
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
244 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|