To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11317
11316  |  11318
Subject: 
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:58:07 GMT
Viewed: 
788 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
I'm very confused.

Chris:
Neither the lion nor the wildebeest is concerned with
morality.  It is an action completely without moral regard.  It is therefore
amoral.  But not immoral.

Scott:
I agree.

Larry:
Sounds like you agree, then: animals are amoral.

Scott:
No, it sounds like you are puuting words in my mouth.

Hah! Beautiful work, Dave!

Scott, please clarify. What *is* your position? Or is it merely whatever
Larry is *not*?

Yes, Dave is right-- it seems evident here, Scott. I know you guys always
disagree and you'll never convince each other to see an issue the same way
so just agree to disagree. The world does not revolve around anything that
anyone says on this forum anyway. Who gives a rat's ass?

You "pass judgement" on others too much. Who are you to infer your moral
values on others - judging them by your own standard? Do you assume you are
the role model they should aspire to?

Do you not do the same? Don't I? Doesn't Larry? Don't all morally conscious
creatures pass moral judgement? If not, then what's the point (read use) of
having a moral judgement? If so, then what standard can we judge against
except our own?

We are always passing judgement, whether we post it here or keep it in our
heads. I'm pretty sure some LUGNETers think I'm some arrogant, weirdo,
vegetarian hippie dude who won't kill bacteria and thinks the United States
and Israel are the great Satans of the earth. Who cares? This forum is
equally filled with great statements and bullsh*t statements, depending on
how you look at it. Let's just try to be gentlemen about it either way.

Dan



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
I'm very confused. Chris: (...) Scott: (...) Larry: (...) Scott: (...) Scott, please clarify. What *is* your position? Or is it merely whatever Larry is *not*? (...) Do you not do the same? Don't I? Doesn't Larry? Don't all morally conscious (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR