 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) So where would that outlook stand on this story: (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | ** bump ** (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | You ought to wait 2-3 days, at least, before bumping... (...) discriminate at all. Not enough facts in the story to judge what is going on in this particular case. Not an important enough case, really, to justify my trying to research it further to (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) At least one person was found guilty. Fact enough. Is your line not that the proprietor should be free allow skin colour to decide the level of service s/he provides? That s/he should be allowed to humiliate a fellow citizen purely because of (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
