Subject:
|
Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:03:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1362 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: • <snipped some stuff>
> Yeah, Larry! It's your fault that Tom is rude and that Daniel wants to fight
> him over it. Shame on you.
Hey, I don't want to fight Tom or anybody, Chris. If Tom feels he can
constantly take a nasty tone with me on-line, that's his choice. It doesn't
impress me. If he says he's this way in person, he's welcome to come try
this act in person with me. I'm not seeking him out for a fight but I'm not
rolling over either. If my fellow LUGNETers want to scold me, I understand.
I agree that it's not the best approach that I am choosing, but a man must
know his limits. I realize I could easily not respond and perhaps that's
what I should have done. However, I am drawing a line on Tom's behavior
toward me. It's his choice, not my deliberate provocation, for him to be
crude and mordacious toward me and he'll only get away with it on-line. If
he thinks otherwise, I've invited him to show me.
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
| (...) Yeah, Larry! It's your fault that Tom is rude and that Daniel wants to fight him over it. Shame on you. Actually, I have found it wildly instructive to force myself to appreciate someone who is being rude to me. In certain usenet forums that I (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
