Subject:
|
Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:49:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Yeah, Larry! It's your fault that Tom is rude and that Daniel wants to fight
> him over it. Shame on you.
Now, see? If you were truly using the criteria as you stated before*, I
would have expected a smiley emoticon, or at least an (s), to help a reader
understand the state of mind the statement had been given in. Did you really
intend that as a dig at me? 'Cause I don't honestly know at this point. My
original statement to Larry was given in a funny/sarcastic way...how about
yours?
* (quite well, in fact, I find "And some people are able to just carry on
the conversation as if their fellow had not behaved poorly at all." to be a
great truth in Internet conversation...kudos for coming up with the line)
Matt
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
| (...) Yeah, Larry! It's your fault that Tom is rude and that Daniel wants to fight him over it. Shame on you. Actually, I have found it wildly instructive to force myself to appreciate someone who is being rude to me. In certain usenet forums that I (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
