Subject:
|
Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:39:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1278 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Gerber writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > Yeah, Larry! It's your fault that Tom is rude and that Daniel wants to fight
> > him over it. Shame on you.
> I would have expected a smiley emoticon, or at least an (s)
The (s) thing is new to me. Emoticons are OK sometimes, I use them when I
think there's a doubt about my intent.
> Did you really intend that as a dig at me?
I thought I was going along with you. And I thought it was clear...sometimes I
miss. Sorry.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
| (...) Now, see? If you were truly using the criteria as you stated before*, I would have expected a smiley emoticon, or at least an (s), to help a reader understand the state of mind the statement had been given in. Did you really intend that as a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
