To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10981
10980  |  10982
Subject: 
Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 20:02:18 GMT
Viewed: 
739 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Marc Nelson, Jr. writes:

So if trade is bad, then shouldn't the Iraqis be grateful that they are
sanctioned? Now they don't have to worry about American economic imperialists
exploiting their labor and natural resources. No greedy American business
ventures can make any economic gains by selling things to Iraq. Aren't they
better off?

Maybe I should explain the sanctions against Iraq better. It's not about
trade with America, it's not about business with America, it's about
starving and killing innocent men, women and children and destroying the
infrastructure of Iraq. The sanctions are a ban against any nation trading
or offering aid to Iraq. The sanctions are not particular to American trade
or business with Iraq. The sanctions prevent Iraq from obtaining essential
things from ANY nation-- items such as food, medicine, tires, machine parts
and tools. The Iraqi people IN NO WAY are better off with the sanctions.

And I never said trade is bad.

I just read an interesting piece in The New Republic about the sanctions on
Iraq:
http://www.tnr.com/061801/rubin061801.html

Seems that the Iraqi govt. IS able to get food from other nations, but it
exports it to pay for luxuries for the party elite. It supports the case
that sanctions don't work at changing the behavior of a dictatorship, and
also shows that it is the Iraqi govt. that is responsible for the suffering
of its people, not the sanctions.

-Marc Nelson Jr.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
 
(...) Seems so, according to that one report and I don't doubt for a minute that Saddam wouldn't take the money from the so-called "oil-for-food" program to build palaces and let Iraqis suffer. Even if this report were 100% true, it doesn't change (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
 
(...) Maybe I should explain the sanctions against Iraq better. It's not about trade with America, it's not about business with America, it's about starving and killing innocent men, women and children and destroying the infrastructure of Iraq. The (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR