To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10954
10953  |  10955
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:22:35 GMT
Viewed: 
1275 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Gerber writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes:
<snip>

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Heck, ultimately these reasons are probably the
ONLY reasons we have the public school system we have now.

Nitpicking here - that's not true. The public school system and the
requirement to attend it were formed in the late 19th century. The general
public wanted kids out of the cheap working force, because they were
depressing wages for everyone.

Fascinating! Do you have a cite for that? Should be interesting reading.

Here's info for England: http://twist.lib.uiowa.edu/wompoet/resources.html

"1870 Education Act for England (one for Scotland followed soon after)
established a national system of primary schools for children up to age 12;
in 1880 attendance at primary school was made mandatory."

I can't find anything on America...maybe we never really had to go at all in
the first place! I may have to give up my title.

Matt (Possibly the Former Self-Proclaimed LUGNET King of Citing Stuff ©)

Cool, found it! It's good to be the king!

From: http://coe.asu.edu/edrev/reviews/rev70c.htm

"In England and America, the evidence shows that majority literacy was
achieved under the largely market-based systems of the early 19th century,
and that the spread of completely tax-funded state-run schools did not
accelerate that pre-existing growth in literacy. Furthermore, the U.S.
Census Bureau's own figures show that the enrollment level of white children
actually went down between 1850 and 1900 (p. 84), despite the fact that this
was the period in which state-run schooling expanded across the country and
the majority of states introduced mandatory attendance laws. Though African
American enrollment rose substantially after the Civil War, this was
principally due to the abolition of laws forbidding them from receiving an
education. The bulk of the schools serving newly emancipated black children
appear to have been private ventures."

Matt (Still the Self-Proclaimed LUGNET King of Citing Stuff ©)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Gerber REGALLY PROCLAIMS: (...) YOU ARE the king of Cites. What a great cite. It seems to be saying that mandatory schooling didn't work. That seems to be somewhat anti-dogmatic (if you accept NEA dogma anyway). (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Here's info for England: (URL) Education Act for England (one for Scotland followed soon after) established a national system of primary schools for children up to age 12; in 1880 attendance at primary school was made mandatory." I can't find (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR