 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) That's not a bad assessment, but I think it applies more at the national level than at the level of any sub-national business or industry. Ploughed ground, to be sure, but to date the Libertopian argument hasn't been convincingly put forth. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) The world is changing, regardless, though. Rather arrogant of them, eh, not to care what conclusions we come to here? Peace and freedom, in general, are winning. ++Lar (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) "Them" who? The world at large? I'm not sure what you're referring to. Dave! (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda (was incorrectly referred to as SPAM) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. The world at large not taking LUGNETters opinions into account! The very idea. :-) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda (was incorrectly referred to as SPAM) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, you're making fun of my pseudo-seriousness! Now *I'm* disenfranchised! Dave! (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | But companies would want well-educated employees no matter WHERE they came from, and would most likely contribute on both the local AND national level. For a simple, real world example, look at Silicon Valley as a whole - finding qualified (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
