Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 31 May 1999 17:49:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
645 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 14 May 1999 16:30:06 GMT, Jeff Stembel uttered the following
profundities...
> If it is read to mean any citizen can keep arms (notice it doesn't say
> firearms), then they can be called apon to go to war for the country and they
> must attend training (well regulated) probably similar to what Reservists and
> Guardsman attend.
>
>
And implies justification for the draft/conscription, subject
to personal ownership of arms.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) It says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Now, what is a militia? According to dictionary.com, militia means "In the widest (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
