 | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable —Eric Sophie
| | | | Hey that's cool Bruce, I got a little out of hand, I re-read the thread and I hear where your comming from, I ussually don't get like that on Lugnet, sorry. You rasied some good points, I hope people can appreciate this as I did. I'm 30, so I feel (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Alright, a little overzealous, but I can live with that. We be cool then. Bruce (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable —Eric Sophie
| | | | | | Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable —Eric Sophie
| | | | | | Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable —Eric Sophie
| | | | | Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
