 | | Re: Rolling Blackouts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Here is a start. It is not pretty, but it is a start: (URL) A (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) that I think about it I sure may have been wrong.) What's not pretty about that? The web page, the Ociania complex, or the idea of people building sovreignty on the seas? The only problem with that is that the Ociania project went belly up (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) The complex. (...) In your opinion. I expect it would be full of the elderly nouveaux riche hoping to avoid paying tax. I expect there would be others their too hoping to exploit “freedoms” which are thankfully illegal in most other civilised (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I think that if it were real, it would be technologically nifty...but I guess I agree that it's not really attractive. I would hope to see them do better if they actually got something off the ground...err, shore. (...) Well, yeah. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Yes. But as long as they could pay the "bill" I expect they will be welcome. The alternative, would mean imposing morals on others - and I know you are not a fan of that. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
