To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10429
10428  |  10430
Subject: 
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 12 May 2001 02:59:31 GMT
Viewed: 
2419 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > Ummm, the air flows in behind the rocket.  :-)
> > 
> > It's not as simple as just "air", it's the ozone layer, it's ionized
> > particles, it's air flow currents that are disturbed. We still cannot verify
> > what harm comes to the upper atmosphere during a launch and what effect it
> > has on ultraviolet radiation poking through the atmosphere.
> 
> Can't say that I've heard it causes any appreciable damage (the number of
> launches is miniscule).

  A few years ago I read in a less-than-scrupulously-researched article that
each launching of the space shuttle depletes between 8% and 10% of the ozone
layer.  Now, I'm not a mathematician, but we've had considerably more than 10
or 12 launches, have we not...?

     Dave!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Dang! It's gone! Where's the 200 sun screen? Bruce (25 years ago, 12-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Sure, but it's 8-10% of the current (or remaining) ozone. So the first one stripped away 10% of the original amount, the next one 9%, the next one 8.1%, etc. So we'll always have some left. Or maybe the Ozone Flies just release more. Who (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Our society tends to be quite liberal with the use of percentage figures to back up a supposed presupposition or argument. Did anyone see that Nova episode about meteors? "We don't know how many [large] meteors there are in the solar system, (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Didn't say otherwise, but it seems you are trying to slide the primary blame onto America instead of where it firmly belongs. Believe me, I'm not a big Bush backer. (...) Are you saying that "real" arabs wanted Saddam in control of Kuwait? (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR