Subject:
|
Re: A question of remembrance...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 May 2001 16:20:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1104 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Daniel Jassim wrote:
> > The only way there will be peace in the Middle East is if the greedy
> > Zionists PACK UP AND GO HOME, back to Poland, back to Russia, back to
> > Germany, back to New York, and so on. Give the Arabs back their land and
> > leave them in peace.
>
> Oh, now thats a solution. By that generalization, I belive almost NO ONE
> in the world has any right to live where they live.
Why make my statement sound so far fetched? Is it any more or less valid
than the British finally pulling out of India?
With regard to Israel, I wouldn't call my statement a generalization. The
specific fact remains that the European Jews ran the Arabs off the land,
including fellow Jews. The Zionists are fraudulent in their claims of
distant Semetic bloodlines. They are Europeans. The Arabs have been the
ethnic majority for thousands of years and they were the first Jews,
Christians and Moslems. They've remained there despite invaders like the
Greeks, Romans, Mongols, Turks and so on.
> I think the only way the world will ever come to peace is when every
> person is able to lay down their claim to property because of who their
> ancestors were.
Exactly, and that's why the Zionists need to quit Israel and go home.
> One reason I believe the US is relatively peaceful compared to the world
> as a whole is that some 90% or more of americans have no ancestral claim
> to the land they live on. On the flip side of this, I see a huge
> tradgedy that the reason this is possible is that we essentially
> eliminated the native population.
Exactly what is happening in Israel right now. The pro-Zionist American
media even goes so far as to use the word "settlers" to describe the Israeli
occupiers, feeding on American imagery of the wagon trails and "Westward
ho!" Ask a Native American about the "settlers."
Anyway, thank you for your input, Frank.
Dan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Because after the British "left" India, there were still a lot of Britons who elected to stay, and India still existed. Who would leave if "the greedy Zionists" packed up and "went home" to the places where they--pardon me, their grandparents (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Um, you're missing the point. If everyone lays down their claim, that INCLUDES your Arabs. <cluephone, ring, ring> -- | Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | iPlanet Support - (URL) A division of AOL (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Oh, now thats a solution. By that generalization, I belive almost NO ONE in the world has any right to live where they live. I doubt ANY population in the world can be documented to be living on land they didn't take from someone else (and in (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
197 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
