 | | Re: A Lego display fund raiser —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | Warning, semantic slicing and dicing ahead. :-) (...) I would agree except to say that it should read "is not valid for me" or "I cannot accept it as valid within my framework". I acknowledge that others do find it valid. I judge *them* only on (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A Lego display fund raiser —James Brown
| | | | | (...) Hmm, OK. I'm not certain that the distinction is relevent most of the time unless you're actually in a debate about perceptions of reality, but I'll grant it to you anyway. :) (although taking this any farther is *really* splitting hairs) (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
