Subject:
|
Re: A question of remembrance...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:48:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> richard marchetti wrote:
> > I guess that leaves open the question of the degree to which Israel is the
> > home of Jews AND the home of Palestinians. I don't favor either side, I see
> > blood on everyone's hands. I thought for a while there they were going to
> > declare two independent states, Israel and Palestine - I mean, if they can't
> > play well together, let them play apart from each other. Why didn't that
> > work out? Or can it still? Seems like an excellent solution to me.
I thought for a while that they (the UK) DID declare two independent
states... Israel and Jordan. When the UK partitioned Palestine, that was the
idea. Jordan was to be one part, and Israel the other.
Why didn't that work out?
Or, why do the Palestinians want to keep dividing Israel? If Israel divides
again, will they stop? Or will they then want to divide the remaining half
again, and again, and again? Why hasn't Arafat disavowed the goal of
completely removing Israel? Why does he use kids for terrorists?
I'm not sure it's possible to find a two state solution either.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Good thing for most of Europe enough people thought it was moral to fight a war on foreight soil (though I guess in some cases, outside participation was invited). I also don't think we would have the relative peace we have in Europe had we (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
197 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
