To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *9381 (-10)
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) Like James said my post was meant as Fun Mocking not nasty mocking. It wasn't meant as bashing at all. Fox is what it is and I was making Fun of it. If you took it another way then I am sorry but I won't apologize for directing it where I did (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) Uh...sorry. I honestly didn't mean it that way. I just like to make fun of Fox because they're always running something that they try to make sound all official and astounding and stuff. Although that's possibly because Fox is SUCH and (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) This message has been nothing more than the Fox News Channel bashing, that is why, hence debate. (...) Because I do not like seeing debate material outside where it belongs, among others. Scott S. -- ***...*** Please visit (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) Probably because some people think that a program about the moon landing being a hoax is funny, and not fodder for serious debate. I've certainly been under the impression that the messages in this thread have been ranging from tongue-in-cheek (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
Folks, Why is this in fun? Please take it to off.topic.debate where it belongs. Scott S. ***...*** Please visit (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
To All, Why is this in off.topic.fun? (...) This sounds like quite an opinionated statement, rather than a "fun" statement. I could say the sme thing about CNN, MS-NBC, etc. FUT off.topic.debate Scott S. ***...*** Please visit (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) This is why I love FOX. They arn't afraid of telling the truth and exposing government conspiracies. I hear that they are working right now on "The Earth really is flat" to be followed up by "We are the Center of the Universe". Nice, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Interview with LEGO at Toy Fair
 
(...) The real issue/problem is Lego's inconsistency in their position. Really, it's inconsistency to the point of absurdity. I don't have a problem with weapons in Lego, and I wouldn't have a problem if weapons were absent. It's just hard for me to (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) Nonsense! They must have gone to the moon--otherwise, where would they have gotten the alien for that autopsy? Dave! (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Moon Landing Hoax
 
(...) Sweeps. What happened to simply having Buzz Aldrin in a hot tub surrounded by bikini-clad models? ;-) Bruce (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR