 | | The Fake Fossil (Was: Problems with Darwin's theory)
|
|
(...) Sorry -- I wasn't aiming that one at anyone specifically -- just hoping for some colattoral damage. An old nasty habit. :-, (...) Wow, chilly. Touche. OK, I thought that since you were familiar with the first Geographic article ("Feathered (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) I don't claim that God didn't make everything. I'm only concerned here with the evidence on hand on what happened. I'm not addressing whether it was directed by God in any fashion or not, but simply what actually took place. (...) If it's (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) how incredibly undeniably ludicrous it is to punish someone for pretending poultry is a gun, let's focus on the scary comment in the last paragraph: "Sullivan said punishment for a threat "depends on the tone, the demeanor, and in some manner (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
A fascinating discussion, from the POV of one who believes in both evolution and creationism. It's also a bit amusing to find that so many on both sides apparently (1) reject the notion that it's a little bit of both. But anyway, concerning the fake (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) It should be extremely obvious what I mean, except for someone doing their best to dodge the point. (...) November 98, if I recall. (...) By all means, share your source for it being a fake. (...) You don't admit beating your wife, is the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) Let's not even start that ugly debate again. I've still got scars. Dave! (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) OK. (although it's no more "my" theory than GR is "my" theory...) (...) You claim we haven't provided evidence refuting it. Yet we have discussed the wide variety of fossils, the different ages of various fossils, the transitional fossils, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) Even if he hasn't, I have, and I ask you what does it prove? Bruce, DaveL, and I (among many others) have stated for months that one of the primary strengths of science is its ability to modify itself to provide an increasingly complete (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) What do mean? You've never seen National Geographic? You don't consider it a scientific source? You're not familiar with the reptile/bird fake? All the various evolutionist who were fawning all over it aren't scientists? You don't admit that (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
|
|
(...) You're kidding, right? Read the liner notes on the 2112 album. :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) For starters, that's not a fair question, and you know it. ("Why do you beat your wife?" being the classic example.) Further, I never said anything about proving creation. Please re-read. SRC (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
|
|
(...) Then we agree about (IMHO) the really important part - judging actions not intent. I highly suspect what we're debating for the rest of it is fluff and semantics. <snip examples> (...) Good examples, and a solid case for the relevance of (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
|
|
(...) Larry listens to RUSH? That's a shock ;-) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) I don't care how old he is. Suspension is a bit severe for pointing a piece of *POULTRY* at someone. Imagine trying to defend feeling so threatened by someone pointing a peice of (presumably boneless, even) food at you that you wanted to get a (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) I agree. Clearly it let *you* down somewhere along the line, at least in a minor way. :-) (Way to mess up on the too/to thingie, eric. Don't you hate it when that happens to a post you wrote? I do too. It happens too much. ) (an eric slips (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) Oh, Tim. That was fowl. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) I think you're too chicken to blame the school system. (now don't get saucy with me) ;) -Tim (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) DaveE (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) Sure, have a talk with him. Yes, discuss things and talk to him about why it's inappropriate to be casual with mock violence. Suspension is just a bit severe for an 8 year old. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping Our Schools Safe
|
|
(...) school (which is good), you are not allowed to think about a gun. Thought police. Wonderful. Yet another reason the USA's public school system is way to messed up. eric (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
