|
|
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Why? So you could avoid this point? "If you fault my system for not explaining the origin of the universe, why then, I fault yours for not explaining the origin of your god. No better no worse, explanation wise. A draw." I'd rather see you (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Thanks for summarizing, Dave!. I find Jon and Tim's references hard slogging for the most part, since they're obviously written for uncritical thinkers. They tend to be a tough read for anyone else. Of course, I personally have to disagree (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I've said enough...
|
| (Note: I'm not debating in this post) (...) Well you're sort of right and sort of not. My problem with this particular debate is my lack of debate experience coupled with my lack of scientific training. To be truthful, however, I have studied the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Hubris
|
| (...) I'm extremely proud of my hubris. Dave! (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
|
| (...) :-) I think we are - however, having read many ancient myths, I am ever cautious of hubris ;-) Jennifer Clark (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
