|
|
 | | Re: Credibility... (Was: Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"))
|
| (...) So if DAVE says it, it's Self-aggrandizement, but if a Creationist says it about their credit hours in science, it's not, it's proof they know what they are talking about? Elaborate, please. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
|
| (...) Sounds like the Bible to me. Pot - kettle - black. (...) In the US? Damned straight I would - Separation of Church and State, remember? Now, if it were a PRIVATE school, more power to you. But if a public school that gets MY tax money, that (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I've said enough...
|
| (...) Ditto to this and all that followed. I've been chomping at the bit all week, just dying to jump in, but didn't for much the same reasons. At this point I would like to share a few observations, but only because I'm preparing to take my monthly (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) Since Jon is manifestly unable to answer a question when asked of him, can someone else (preferably a critical thinker) among us point to the post in which Jon allegedly provided the answer? Or any answer, really? Dave! (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Concerning Evolution vs. Creation
|
| (...) I totally agree (I'd put myself in the (b) category). (...) Which means that you can't use Creation "Science" without accepting a literal interpretation of the Bible. (...) This model is: (1) Subject to change, criticism, improvement and total (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
