 | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Joakim Olsson" <jocke@arjay.nu> wrote in message news:G2vJIA.B55@lugnet.com... (...) that (...) make (...) want (...) They, overwhelming return pro-UK candidates in local/national/eu elections. (...) really (...) highschool, (...) You are right in (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G2uFr7.BxA@lugnet.com... (...) you're (...) This should have been "Not a "slag", and not just the USA." (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2uJ31.KFo@lugnet.com... (...) always (...) Iraq or (...) be (...) state (...) that (...) So the democratically take land from those who have lived there for ~1500 years to give to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) Well, you are probably right. I do not have all of the facts. Do you have all the facts regarding middle-east? Have they been able to vote about theese issues lately in NI? I know(read it in history books) in the past, that they grouped people (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A little self examination?
|
|
(...) I get it. It was not a good example, it was not since I used "popular" and "respected" interchangeably. But still I think, in some extent, spending large amounts means somehow dedication to me, so being popular by it, is not so bad also. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A little self examination?
|
|
(...) :-) Yes, I'm surprised. You are correct at all. Actually, it's also surprised that this is the first message from me replied by four individuals..:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) the (...) OK. Which part of this were contorted then: Have the Israelis used disproportionate force? The video footage of 12-year-old Muhammed al-Durrah cowering beside his father before being shot by an Israeli soldier prompted much (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Joakim Olsson" <jocke@arjay.nu> wrote in message news:G2uqw7.AMq@lugnet.com... (...) I have views on NI. They will remain my own for now. But the point you make is misleading. It is an accepted fact that the majority of those in NI want to be part (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Selçuk Göre" <ssgore@superonline.com> wrote in message news:39F34CD8.E3863E...ine.com... (...) like (...) Just (...) to be a (...) Arafat (...) "real country"? (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2uJ31.KFo@lugnet.com... (...) always (...) Iraq or (...) be (...) state (...) that (...) Barak (...) I suppose I am. What other country uses tanks and gunships to quell civil (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
