 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
(...) I may be wrong, but I think Larry's answer to this question will be similar to mine. If I were to agree that we should be funding SS & Medicaid/Medicare at all (and for the most part I don't) I might agree that money spent on research to find (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: [snip] (...) that (...) to (...) to (...) You'll get my answers once you have answered my question (which YOU have refused to answer and I am now asking now for the THIRD time) - Most AIDS victims (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: positive impeachment
|
|
(...) clogged (...) Dan Quayle for president, baby! Tanned, rested, ready, and too dim to cause any trouble. ++Lar (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: May Day "riots" in London
|
|
(...) never (...) infrastructure. (...) Oh, sorry about this but.... I agree with you. And with Alex. You're talking about armed insurrection and you are as usual, spot on. Alex is talking about law abiding peaceful demonstration and he is right as (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: positive impeachment
|
|
(...) Been there, done that. Or at least the California Republicans have. Sorta. They had a one vote edge in one of the two state houses and were exultantant that they would finally replace the demonized Willy Brown as Speaker of the House with one (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
