To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *3936 (-5)
  Re: Spoiler... (was Re: Blair Witch Project - Thoughts?)
 
(...) The official web site had the interviews as they were filmed (not edited like in the movie), so if anyone needs a refresher, I'd go there. I'd have to agree that the fishermen were the worst actors in the movie. They weren't SUPPOSED to be (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Spoiler... (was Re: Blair Witch Project - Thoughts?)
 
(...) I don't think it's a big deal, but just in case.... SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! SPOILER!!!! (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Peter Callaway writes: <snip> (...) I think this is the heart of the "profanity in newsgroups" debate. I can fully understand profanity in the heat of the moment, in a spoken conversation. It is extremely easy to let a (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Blair Witch Project - Thoughts?
 
What was the slip up? I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, and did not notice anything? (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Blair Witch Project - Thoughts?
 
(...) cost (...) ???????? (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR