 | | Re: Frog
|
|
(...) Think I'll pass on eating THAT meat, especially the part where the injection was done. :-) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Frog
|
|
(...) Lethal Injection? You do it to cats * dogs when they outlive their usefulness... Jasper (26 years ago, 5-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Frog
|
|
(...) This reminds me of something. My wife's parents had a small flock of sheep. When it came time to slaughter them for market, they hired someone from the Yellow Pages to do the killing and cleaning. His method of execution involved three quick (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Frog
|
|
(...) That's just the Kosher laws, which Mohammed rebadged and spiffed up. Modern evidence is starting to show that the throat cutting method, while very humane by 1000 AD standards, may still cause some pain. not sure there's a better way, though. (26 years ago, 5-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Frog
|
|
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:27:57 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) You should eat meat the Arab way, rather, buy Halal meat. One of the things decreed by Mohammed was that the animal killed for consumption should die in the (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Frog
|
|
(...) OK, good to know. Learn something every day, these groups are great for that. Nevertheless I myself try not to do things that may appear to be cruel, even if they're not, because I don't want to remember what sorts of animals are capable of (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) merely (...) So...if we put YOU in this box and a cup of coffee, there is no way we can tell wether you drank the coffee or not? [11] B-) Follow-up set to .fun (I hope..never tried it before) [11] or can we assume you will drink it?[12] [12] (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) <stuff> (...) Ohwell. Why can't I try to keep a straight face? Jasper (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) we (...) for (...) Sigh..I should have taken it to .fun I am well aware of the various aspects of the Shroedinger theorum, I was merely attempting some humor. Mea Culpa, it won't happen again.(1) 1: if this sounds a bit snide, that's because (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) The box is sound, light & air proof. In fact, the material used is impervious to any Electromagnetic radiation. Otherwise, the first particle/photon that it emitted and that would happen to collide with either the observer, or cause something (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
