 | | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) My point is that john is wrong, with corroborating evidence. (...) I spend a lot of time in areas the homeless are likely to hang out. It's called the inner city. Look at the statistics sometime - the US has a bigger problem, on average. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
In article <MPG.12ebf024c0b516b...gnet.com>, richard.dee@virgin.net says... (...) The Sun is a quality paper, the sports coverage is the best - at least they are truthful, take News of the World who constantly get stuff wrong and the Daily Mail (1) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government vs Corporations - Was: (Re: Art Debate)
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) The (...) put (...) valve (...) place? (...) impossible (...) event. From a civil suit point of view, it may be sufficient to sue the corporation. Ultimately, the board of directors is responsible. The (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
|
|
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote in message <388113B3.23F0F572@vfaq.com>... (...) for one (...) to pay for (...) to prove (...) In North Carolina, personal possessions in the car are covered by homeowners/renters insurance, at least by State Farm. There (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
(...) All _Canadian_ Sun's are owned by the same people...and yes, they are trashy/semi tabloid. Canada's Papers National Post..Not bad, a Business Newspaper (the local papers by Thompson/Conrad Black are quite good usually) Toronto Star..used to be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999 03:53:54 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) The other example of trashy "Sun"'s is no doubt based on the UK version? You should check out the UK paper, "The Daily Sport," and its sibling, "The Sunday (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
(...) Official what? (...) Ah - *thats* what you mean.. cool, agreed! (...) There's no reason why you couldn't use the existing infrastructure as a scaffolding to create a new one. (...) Except that the federal government can close or open any (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) vote (...) Except, I suppose, officials? (...) great (...) It was a comparison. I wasn't sure if we were ready for square one yet. We need to be sure we are on about the same wavelength. (...) everything (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
(...) I'll give it my best go. (...) I agree - because once you have Social Groupings that organise their own affairs independently, there won't be *MUCH* that you'd need *EVERYONE* to vote on at one time? (...) Well, if that means that you think my (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government vs Corporations - Was: (Re: Art Debate)
|
|
(...) How do you hold a company's officers liable? If company X spills toxic goo into a river, who is responsible? The worker who didn't close the valve? The supervisor who didn't make sure it got closed? The process engineer who put the valve near (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
