 | | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Janey-- If I had known of JLUG, I'd have been there. Sorry to have missed all the fun, but best of all new endeavors to you. It sounds like it would have been fun. Especially the robotic cat thing. Play Well and Prosper, Matthew "The Brick (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Says you. Ley (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Surely you could have summed up all of the above with "Bonk"... ;-) Peace and precis, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Surely you could have summed up all of the above with "Bonk"... ;-) Peace and precis, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Alas, how will I continue my 'debate' with Lar? Thanks Janey and Ross for all your efforts. I shall now doubly cherish my engraved brick. Peace and passing, Professor Whateverly (URL) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) On closer inspection it would appear that copyright law is a bit more complex in what it covers than I realised (second paragraph of (URL) suspect that Lego may differ from needlepoint because of this in that it is (most probably) counted as a (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) not exactly. The printing of the design can be copyright, however what you do with building it is not. I am more familiar with the needlework part of this for an example. You cannot copy the instructions, however you can stitch as many designs (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe B-Unit: OK or not?
|
|
(...) It's good to hear they will act. Does this mean you create needlepoint and collect Lego? Interesting combination of hobbies. (...) Copyright law is complex. Ownership of copyright is usually very easy (at least when it's not part of a (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Janey "Red Brick" Why the heck you did that?.. Just heard the news from Gambort and shocked. Man, I was trying to connect to The Place every other day, still living in hope to see the day my connection problems are solved. Now I know this will (...) (17 years ago, 23-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) :-( (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) And only a few weeks ago we were flooded by a stream of refugees. LROYWD. I'm sad JLUG's gone. It's been a nice time. OTOH, there's no evidence of that resumé stain now... JLUG2 looks wizard though. (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Phew! Finally got my posting rights back. I've been with JLUG since a few days after it was made and even today it's the one place that made me feel at home on the internet. I remarked to CM Janey the day it was announced here on lugnet that I felt (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Seems to me its the one place on Lugnet that all Journeymen could be guaranteed to read sooner or later. Very sad tidings gang. But the fact that its gone does not diminish how much I loved it, which was a lot. Thanks. Oh, and just once more, (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) No doubt because of Dagger Guy. Farewell, JLUG! We'll miss ya. Cheers! "Big Daddy" Nelson (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) This post is flawed. Bryce (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) My reference to meant collapsing under the admin load is not meant to be insulting toward CL Ross and Mistress Janey. They did do a lot of work behind the scenes. In fact, some of the things they delivered were the most wizard that I've seen (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
--snip-- (...) I disagree with that. (...) Tim (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Well, thanks for the kind words everyone, for a forum that never expected to reach 19 members we did ok. But it was time to call it a day. The other parts of jlug.net will remain for the time being, it may even get updated occasionally. Wink. (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) I was wondering why he shaved the beard off. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) If you can get through to the mechahub one you can get through to #jlug. Come in and I'll tell you how. Tim (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
