To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28537
28536  |  28538
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:32:24 GMT
Viewed: 
7214 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin wrote:

   No. No discussion. Why not register us, and see how it goes? Will it collapse in a mountain of anticommunitarian trolling? Will you collapse under the admin load? I suspect neither.

My reference to meant collapsing under the admin load is not meant to be insulting toward CL Ross and Mistress Janey. They did do a lot of work behind the scenes.

In fact, some of the things they delivered were the most wizard that I’ve seen in any online LEGO forum. But perhaps some of the things like s’lighting, the LPV and MOT galleries, jugstars, the automatic deacrynoming of CTOPs, the cute smilies and so on were a bit too much of an overhead. Wherever did they get the ideas for such features?

So, kudos to CL Ross and Mistress Janey for what they achieved.

Cheers

Richie Dulin
JLUG2 Community Overlooker



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) No. No discussion. Why not register us, and see how it goes? Will it collapse in a mountain of anticommunitarian trolling? Will you collapse under the admin load? I suspect neither. But carpe diem and all that. You have built it, they are (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

57 Messages in This Thread:

































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR