| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) ... and until the weekend Bush was adamant it was infiltrators (Syrians, Iranians, Chechnyans etc) and "Sadam loyalists" who were to blame for the trouble. Scott A (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) Despite the noise coming from Washington, and the right's "islamo-fascist" paranoia, Iraq remains < (URL) secular>. That said, I agree that Bush is radicalizing moderate opinion
and not just in Iraq! Only one country remains placid: his own. (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) Yup, this is exactly what I expected would happen - remove Saddam's infrastructure and the chief organizing force would be the religious fundamentalists, who will, of course, end up being a bigger threat than Saddam ever was. -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) I assume, across the pond, it doesn't look like what we saw from here but, I assure you, we, the people living down here don't need to read that article to see how "spectacular" it is. It amazes me dearly when I see how naive you Americans can (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) Pretty much what we both felt would be the case. It's a long article, but a fairly interesting one. -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|